<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Interesting Progression	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://theholtsite.com/blog/3327/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://theholtsite.com/blog/3327/</link>
	<description>Ben, Jill, and Alice Holt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben Holt		</title>
		<link>https://theholtsite.com/blog/3327/#comment-14779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Holt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theholtsite.com/blog/?p=3327#comment-14779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That makes sense!  Still, an Amen half cadence is really odd, and I stand by theory that Bach just had too much sugar in his tea or something that day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense!  Still, an Amen half cadence is really odd, and I stand by theory that Bach just had too much sugar in his tea or something that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dcn. Brench		</title>
		<link>https://theholtsite.com/blog/3327/#comment-14778</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dcn. Brench]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theholtsite.com/blog/?p=3327#comment-14778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t have time to think about it when you pointed it out to me yesterday, but now you&#039;ve mentioned it again, I think the half cadence makes more sense than what would essentially be a sudden key change to E minor.

The reason is that if you follow the phrases of the hymn, it centers around the key of A minor more regularly than C major.  Even just looking at the accidentals, they&#039;re all sharps, where C major would be likely to have some B-flats.

So my guess is that the whole hymn is actually in A minor, which happens to end with a Deceptive Cadence in the relative major (probably for lyric-matching reasons).  Then the Amen half cadence ending matches the same mysterious minor-to-major play that went on in the body of the melody.

Music theory is fun!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t have time to think about it when you pointed it out to me yesterday, but now you&#8217;ve mentioned it again, I think the half cadence makes more sense than what would essentially be a sudden key change to E minor.</p>
<p>The reason is that if you follow the phrases of the hymn, it centers around the key of A minor more regularly than C major.  Even just looking at the accidentals, they&#8217;re all sharps, where C major would be likely to have some B-flats.</p>
<p>So my guess is that the whole hymn is actually in A minor, which happens to end with a Deceptive Cadence in the relative major (probably for lyric-matching reasons).  Then the Amen half cadence ending matches the same mysterious minor-to-major play that went on in the body of the melody.</p>
<p>Music theory is fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
